What arguments are compatible or incompatible with the author’s stance?

Ponder what the author’s intent is in writing the assigned pieces. Did he or she succeed? Is the author persuasive? What would it mean if the author is right or wrong? What other arguments are compatible or incompatible with the author’s stance? Long baths, showers, walks, or aimless metro rides are perfect situations for contemplation. As to citation, though the Chicago Manual of Style is the preferred guidebook for philosophical writing, any scholarly format is acceptable, provided it is consistent throughout the assignment. All quotes and ideas taken from sources other than the student’s mind are to be scrupulously cited to avoid plagiarism and cheating. It is cheating to consult other sources to supplement your understanding of the reading. Part of the work of philosophy is interpreting the text, so students who look to other sources for guidance on interpretation inevitably adulterate their own views of the material.Generally speaking, philosophical writing is argumentative, in that it states a clear position the author means to defend at the beginning, and spends the rest of the paper proving the thesis. Great papers are equal parts textual evidence and author opinion. Students should refer to the texts and quote them throughout the paper. On the basis of the text, students should then assert their own voices, offering an interpretation or answer to a prompt that goes beyond mere summary of the reading(s) at hand. The most common types of poorly-written papers have unclear theses, over-cite the text, or devolve into unproven speculation. • Response Papers -1-2 pages in length, due at the beginning of a class. Students will select a short passage from the text that is especially fascinating, troubling, or important, and analyze it in the paper. Numerous techniques may be used to assess the passage: students might contextualize the passage within the work as awhole; they might show ways in which the passage opens up new avenues of thought; they might show how the passage throws the entire work into question; or they might try to make a confusing passage clear through their analysis. Students should offer both an interpretation of the text and some creative thought on it.

What We Offer:
• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professionals
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% money-back guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

find the cost of your paper

 What would be the number one reason for using resource-based theory (RBT), complexity theory, and complex network theory? How does each contribute to an understanding of enterprise data analytics? 

***Doctorate Level Questions*** No Plagiarism….Paraphrase the content, and provide Citations and at least TWO Reference Sources for each question provided….Please provide a substantive response for EACH question. Each question should….

Write about your last weekend (Friday, Saturday, Sunday). Refer the passage on the textbook p.305.III.

Writing Assignment p.305 IV.B なまえ /10 p.305 IV.B Write about your last weekend (Friday, Saturday, Sunday). Refer the passage on the textbook p.305.III. Use past tense. Use Kanji where applicable…..

Discuss the role of language in cultural and ethnic diversity. Identify terms and/or phrases that were “acceptable” when you were younger, but are now considered insensitive or offensive

T ‌‌‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‌‍‍ he name of this class is Cultural Pluralism in order to let you know. this is to be posted in blackboard. Discuss the role of language in cultural….